Next: Problem 9: Edge-Unfolding Convex
Up: The Open Problems Project
Previous: Problem 7: k-sets
Problem 8: Linear Programming: Strongly Polynomial?
- Statement
- Is linear programming strongly polynomial?
- Origin
- Nimrod Megiddo [Meg82][Meg83].
- Status/Conjectures
- Open.
- Partial and Related Results
- It is known to be weakly polynomial, exponential in
the bit complexity of the input data [Kha80,Kar84].
Subexponential time is achievable
via a randomized algorithm [MSW96].
In any fixed dimension, linear programming can be solved
in strongly polynomial linear time
(linear in the input size),
established in dimensions 2 and 3 in [Dye84]
and for all dimensions in [Meg84].
- Appearances
- [MO01]
- Categories
- linear programming
- Entry Revision History
- J. O'Rourke, 2 Aug 2001, 16 Jul 2007.
- Dye84
-
M. E. Dyer.
Linear time algorithms for two- and three-variable linear programs.
SIAM J. Comput., 13:31-45, 1984.
- Kar84
-
N. Karmarkar.
A new polynomial-time algorithm for linear programming.
Combinatorica, 4:373-395, 1984.
- Kha80
-
L. G. Khachiyan.
Polynomial algorithm in linear programming.
U.S.S.R. Comput. Math. and Math. Phys., 20:53-72, 1980.
- Meg82
-
N. Megiddo.
Is binary encoding appropriate for the problem-language relationship?
Theoret. Comput. Sci., 19:337-341, 1982.
- Meg84
-
N. Megiddo.
Linear programming in linear time when the dimension is fixed.
J. Assoc. Comput. Mach., 31:114-127, 1984.
- Meg83
-
N. Megiddo.
Towards a genuinely polynomial algorithm for linear programming.
SIAM J. Comput., 12:347-353, 1983.
- MO01
-
J. S. B. Mitchell and Joseph O'Rourke.
Computational geometry column 42.
Internat. J. Comput. Geom. Appl., 11(5):573-582, 2001.
Also in SIGACT News 32(3):63-72 (2001), Issue 120.
- MSW96
-
J. Matoušek, Micha Sharir, and Emo Welzl.
A subexponential bound for linear programming.
Algorithmica, 16:498-516, 1996.
The Open Problems Project - July 24, 2008